How Dayfiles Reviews and Updates Content

How topics are selected

Dayfiles prioritizes topics that map to recurring file jobs, product-supported workflows, and high-friction tasks where people are likely to make avoidable mistakes.

The site should not publish a page just because a keyword exists. A topic must justify itself as a useful workflow explanation or decision-support page.

How guides are reviewed

Guides are reviewed for task specificity, structure, screenshot support, link accuracy, and whether the explanation reflects the real job rather than a generic content template.

Pages that feel too similar to neighboring content should be rewritten, consolidated, or deprioritized rather than left to create low-value-content signals.

How sources are chosen

Sources are chosen based on whether they help verify a workflow claim, a product route, a technical standard, or a policy-sensitive instruction.

A source block should support the page. It should not exist only to make the article look more legitimate.

How corrections and updates are handled

When a correction request or stale-content issue is credible, Dayfiles updates the visible page content, not just metadata or hidden notes.

If a guide becomes materially misleading, outdated, or too weak to justify its place in the public archive, it should be rewritten heavily or removed from active promotion.

What would cause a page to be rewritten or unpublished

• the product route changed enough that the article no longer matches
• the screenshots no longer help a reader orient themselves
• the page is too repetitive compared with stronger neighboring content
• the article does not add meaningful value beyond routing readers elsewhere
• the page creates trust or monetization risk disproportionate to its usefulness

Related Dayfiles pages

• How Dayfiles tests workflows
• Editorial Policy
• Contact Dayfiles